Cover Image

Mapping landscape attractiveness – A GIS-based landscape appreciation model for the Dutch countryside

Janneke Roos-Klein Lankhorst, Sjerp de Vries, Arjen Buijs

Abstract


Offering people scenic beauty is one of the most frequently mentioned landscape services. In the Netherlands it also has become an explicit policy goal: “we want a beautiful country to live and work in”. However, instruments to help policy makers and spatial planners to implement this relatively new goal are largely lacking. Where do people like the landscape in their living environment and where do they not? And which physical characteristics influence this appreciation and to what extent? To provide such information in a cost-efficient way, a model was developed to map, monitor, and simulate precisely this: the GIS-based Landscape Appreciation Model (GLAM).

The model predicts the attractiveness of the landscape based solely on nationally available GIS-data on its physical aspects for each 250 x 250 metre cell. The model was calibrated using attractiveness ratings from a national survey among residents. The final model was evaluated using data from another Dutch survey of landscape appreciation among residents living in the vicinity of 52 areas that landscape experts considered being of high quality. In this article, we describe the theoretical background to GLAM, the attributes in the current version of the model, the final steps in calibrating the model, as well as its validation. We conclude with a discussion on the usefulness of GLAM for spatial policy.


Keywords


GLAM model; landscape indicators; landscape attractiveness; GIS; landscape planning; landscape policy; scenic beauty; naturalness; relief; historical distinctiveness; skyline disturbance; urbanity; landscape preference

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aoki, Y. (1999) Review article: trends in the study of the psychological evaluation of landscape. Landscape Research 24: 85-94

Bishop, I.D., and Hulse, D.W. (1994) Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning 30; 59-70

Brown, G. (2006) Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research 8; 101–113

Buijs, A., Pedroli, B., and Luginbühl, Y. (2006) From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape. Changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology 21; 375-389

Coeterier, J.F. (1996) Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 34; 27-44

Daniel, T.C. (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54; 267-281

De Boer, T., Buijs, A.E., and Berg, A.E. van den (1999) Groene gebieden rondom Zoetermeer. Wageningen, Staring Centre.

De Vries, S., and Gerritsen, E. (2003) Van fysieke kenmerken naar landschappelijke schoonheid; de voorspellende waarde van fysieke kenmerken, zoals vastgelegd in ruimtelijke bestanden, voor de schoonheidsbeleving van Nederlandse landschappen. Wageningen, Alterra (rapport 718)

De Vries, S., and van Kralingen, R.B.A.S. (2002) De beleving van het Nederlandse landschap door haar bewoners; de geschiktheid van het SPEL-instrument voor monitoringsdoeleinden. Wageningen, Alterra (rapport 609)

Dramstad, W.E., Tveit, M.S., Fjellstad, W.J., and Fry, G.L.A. (2006) Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 78 ; 465–474

Fairclough, G. (2002) A forward-looking convention: European landscapes for the 21st century. Naturopa 98; 5-6.

Goossen, C.M., and Langers, F. (2000) Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: finding the most important indicators for recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 46; 241-251.

Goossen, C.M., Langers, F., and de Vries, S. (2001) Gelderse stilte? Onderzoek naar de stiltebeleving van recreanten. Wageningen, Alterra (rapport nr. 398)

Gujarati, D.N. (1995) Basic Econometrics 3rd edition. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Herzog, T.R., Herbert, E.J., Kaplan, R., and Crooks, C.L. (2000) Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior 32 (3); 323-346

Hunziker, M., and Kienast, F. (1999) Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty – a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment. Landscape Ecology 14; 161-176

Jabben, J., Dassen, A., and Hoffmans, W. (2000) Informatiestructuur Landelijk Beeld Verstoring. Bilthoven, RIVM (rapport 725501.202)

Kaplan, S. and, Kaplan, R. (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York, Cambridge University Press.

LNV, Ministry of (2000) ‘Nature for people, people for nature’, policy document on nature, forest and landscape in the 21st century. The Hague, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries.

Palmer, J.F., and Hoffman, R.E. (2001) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning 54; 149-161

Purcell, A.T., and Lamb R. (1998) Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 42; 57-66

Real E., Arce, C., and Sabucedo, J.M. (2000) Classification of landscapes using quantitative and categorical data, and prediction of their scenic beauty in north-western Spain. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20 (4); 355-373

Reneman, D., Visser, M., Edelman, E., and Mors, B. (1999) Mensenwensen; de wensen van Nederlanders ten aanzien van natuur en groen in de leefomgeving. Wageningen/Hilversum, Staring Centre/Intomart (reeks Operatie Boomhut nr. 6)

Roos-Klein Lankhorst, J., Vries, S. de, Buijs, A.E., Bloemmen, M.H.I. van den, and Schuiling, C (2005) BelevingsGIS versie 2; waardering van het Nederlandse landschap door de bevolking op kaart. Wageningen, Alterra (rapport 1138)

Roos-Klein Lankhorst, J, de Vries, S., van Lith-Kranendonk, J., Dijkstra, H., and J.M.J. Farjon, 2004. Modellen voor de graadmeters landschap, beleving en recreatie. Kennismodel Effecten Landschap Kwaliteit KELK, Monitoring Schaal en BelevingsGIS. Wageningen, Natuurplanbureau vestiging Wageningen (Planbureaurapporten nr. 20) http://www.wotnatuurenmilieu.wur.nl/NR/rdonlyres/BE00DD2C-51E0-4FB4-85CE-5B63673F07CB/20622/Planbureaurapporten_20_laag.pdf

Ribe, R. (1989) The Aesthetics of Forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management 13 (1); 55-74

SNM (2005) Nederland kan zo mooi zijn; onderzoek naar de beleving van 52 gebieden door omwonenden; deel 1: landelijke conclusies en resultaten. Utrecht, Stichting Natuur and Milieu.

Strumse, E. (1994) Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environ¬mental Psychology 14; 293-303

Tveit, M.S., Ode, A., and Fry, G. (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31 (3); 229-255

Ulrich, R.S. (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman, I., and Wohlwill, J.F. (eds), Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research 6. New York, Plenum Press, pp 85-126.

Van den Berg, A.E. (1999) Individual differences in the aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes. Thesis. Groningen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Verweij, P.J.F.M.(2004) Osiris manual. W!SL, Wageningen.

Zube, E.H. (1987) Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology 1; 37-45




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/rius.2.210

Copyright (c) 2013 Janneke Roos-Klein Lankhorst, Sjerp de Vries, Arjen Buijs

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.