Cover Image

A critical approach to some new ideas about the Dutch flood risk system

Ties Rijcken

Abstract


Decisions on measures to improve a flood risk system are in part supported by general ideas about how the system works and should work. After the completion of the Dutch Delta Works around 1990, such new ideas regarding flood risk emerged. Some of these may be appealing at first, but appear debatable after a closer look. In this paper, fourteen such debatable ideas, familiar to most Dutch water professionals, are formulated and criticised, in order to find out what can be learned from them. The most important Dutch national flood risk policy documents since 1990 are reviewed for quotes that illustrate these ideas, complemented by scientific papers and other documents. These quotes present different expressions of these ideas, and their number can suggest whether they are broadly shared or marginal. In twelve of the twenty most important government documents, 47 quotes were found; in 26 documents of other types, another 39. Eleven quotes describe the idea that ‘water should not be our enemy, but our friend’. Fifteen quotes were based on the idea that flood protection entraps us in a dangerous ‘spiral of risk’, which can be stopped, 44 quotes are related to the idea that flood risk reducing measures should be ‘natural’ or ‘move with nature’. The remaining quotes illustrate other debatable ideas, such as ‘water should lead spatial planning’ and ‘rivers should not be squeezed into a corset’. The frequency of such quotes suggests that ideas about ‘water as a friend’, the ‘spiral of risk’ and ‘moving with nature’ have not been marginal. It is however difficult to determine how influential they have been in decision-making, since general ideas are not the only factors leading to decisions. The general critique to the three ideas is that they present preferred measures as generally logical conclusions without a systematic comparison of alternatives for particular situations. Behind the new ideas lies increasing societal interest for objectives like an attractive water landscape (water as a friend), reducing our dependence on technology (spiral of risk) and nature conservation and development (moving with nature). This analysis further suggests a couple of final remarks, which are hard to prove and are open for discussion.


Keywords


flood risk; water infrastructure; systems analysis; policy analysis; soft objectives; quality; aesthetics; meaning; storytelling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aerts, J. (2008) Dealing with uncertainty in flood management through diversification. Ecology and Society 13(1): 41

Boorsma, K. (2007) Deltaplan 2007. Drachten, Ingenieursbureau Boorsma B.V.

Braakhekke, W. et al. (2008) Hoogtij voor Laag Nederland (High Tide for the Low Lands), WWF/Stroming

Brinke, W.B.M. ten, et al. (2008) The safety chain approach in flood risk management. Proceedings of the ICE – Municipal Engineer 161 (2), pp 93-102

Bruijn, H. de (2011) Framing, over de macht van taal in de politiek (Framing, about the power of language in politics). Amsterdam, Atlas

Collins, H. & R. Evans (2007) Rethinking expertise. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Commissie WB21 (2000) Waterbeleid voor de 21e eeuw – Geef water de ruimte en de aandacht die het verdient; advies van de Commissie Waterbeheer 21e eeuw (Water policy 21st century – give water the space and attention it deserves; recommendations by the Commission Water Management 21st century). Den Haag, Commissie WB21

Correljé, A. & B. Broekhans (2014) Flood risk management in the Netherlands after the 1953 flood: a competition between the public value(s) of water. Journal of Flood Risk Management (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue), pp 1-17

Deltacommittee (2008) Working together with water; a living land builds for its future – Findings of the Deltacommissie 2008. Den Haag, Secretariat Deltacommittee

Deltaprogramma (2010) Deltaprogramma 2011: werk aan de delta (working on the delta). Den Haag, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu a.o.

Deltaprogramma (2011) Deltaprogramma 2012: maatregelen van nu, voorbereidingen van morgen (acting today, preparing for tomorrow). Den Haag, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu a.o.

Deltaprogramma (2012) Deltaprogramma 2013: de weg naar deltabeslissingen (the road to the delta decisions). Den Haag, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu a.o.

Deltaprogramma (2013) Deltaprogramma 2014 – kansrijke oplossingen voor opgaven en ambities (Delta Programme 2014 – promising solutions for tasks and ambitions). Den Haag, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu a.o

.

Deltares (2014) Bouwen met de natuur in de praktijk (Building with nature in practice). Delta Life 1, pp 14-15

DG Water (2000) Anders omgaan met water; waterbeleid in de 21ste eeuw (A different approach to water management in the 21st century). Den Haag, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat

DG Water (2006) Waterkoers 2 – De visie van DG Water op het waterbeleid in Nederland (The ministry’s vision on Dutch water policy). Den Haag, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat

DGW (2009) Nationaal Waterplan (National Water Plan). Den Haag, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu a.o.

DUT (2014) SimDelta. Retrieved from: http://simdelta.tudelft.nl/ [Accessed February 27, 2014]

Ebregt, J., C.J.J. Eijgenraam, H.J. Stolwijk (2005) Kosteneffectiviteit van maatregelen en paketten: Kosten-batenanalyse voor Ruimte voor de Rivier, deel 2. CPB Document 83. Den Haag

Eijgenraam, C.J.J. (2007) From optimal to practical safety standards for dyke-ring areas. Water Science and Technology 56 (4), pp 113-124

ENW (2012) Meerlaagsveiligheid nuchter bekeken (A sober approach to multi-layered safety). Den Haag, Expertise Netwerk Waterveiligheid

Ham, W. van der (2004) Afleiden of opruimen (Divert or clean up). Den Haag, Directoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaat

Heezik, A.A.S. van (2007) Strijd om de rivieren: 200 jaar rivierenbeleid in Nederland of de opkomst en ondergang van het streven naar de normale rivier (Battle for the rivers, 200 years of river policy in the Netherlands). Haarlem, HNT Historische Producties

Helmer, W. et al. (1992) Levende rivieren (Living rivers). Zeist, Wereld Natuur Fonds

Herk, S. van (2014) Delivering integrated flood risk management: governance for collaboration, learning and adaptation. Delft, UNESCO-IHE

Hoss, F., Jonkman, S.N. & Maaskant, B. (2013) A comprehensive assessment of multilayered safety in flood risk management – the Dordrecht case study. Delft/Lelystad, Delft University of Technology/HKV consultants

Jong, S.A. de, et al. (2000) Advies Integrale Verkenning Benedenrivieren (Recommendation Integral Exploration Lower Rivers). Rotterdam, Rijkswaterstaat Zuid-Holland

Hajer, M., S. van ’t Klooster & J. Grijzen (2011) Strong stories: how the Dutch are reinventing spatial planning. Rotterdam, 010 Publishers

Jongejan, R.B. et al. (2008) A comment on ‘Changing estuaries, changing views’. Hydrobiologia 605 (1), pp 11-15

Jongejan, R.B., S.N. Jonkman & J.K. Vrijling (2012) The safety chain: a delusive concept. Safety Science 50, pp 1299-1303

Jonkman, S.N. (2013) Veilig leven met water? (Living safely with water?). Water Governance 3, pp 37-39

Kind, J.M. (2013) Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands: Efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue), pp 1-15

Klijn, F., M. Kok & H. Moel (2012) Towards climate-change proof flood risk management, Knowledge for Climate, Report nr. KfC 57/2012

Lammers, J. (2009) Dijk en Meer – Eindrapportage verkenning Toekomst Afsluitdijk (Final report of the exploration for the future of the Lake IJssel closure dam). Lelystad, The Netherlands, Rijkswaterstaat IJsselmeergebied

Meyer, H. (2012) Urban design in a dynamic delta. Proceedings of the ICE – Urban Design and Planning 165 (2), pp 89-101

Opmeer, A. (2013) Natuur in het nauw (Nature cornered). Down to earth 16 (4), pp 18-22

PBR (2013) Ruimte voor de Rivier (Room for the River). Retrieved from: http://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/ [Accessed October 2013]

Pols, L. et al. (2007) Overstromingsrisico als ruimtelijke opgave (Flood risk as spatial planning task), Rotterdam/Den Haag, NAi Uitgevers/Ruimtelijk Planbureau

Programmaorganisatie Leven met Water (2006) Leven met Water – organisatie en werkwijze (Living with Water - organisation and method). Gouda, Leven met Water

Projectteam NW4 (1995) Ruimte voor Water – visienotitie als aanzet voor discussie (Space for Water – a vision for discussion). Den Haag, Projectteam NW4

Q-team (2008) Jaarverslag Q-team Ruimte voor de Rivier 2006-2007 (Annual Report Quality-team Room for the River). Utrecht, the Netherlands, Programmadirectie Ruimte voor de Rivier

Q-team (2012) Jaarverslagen Q-team Ruimte voor de Rivier 2009-2011 (Annual Reports Quality-team Space for the Rivers). Utrecht, the Netherlands, Programmadirectie Ruimte voor de Rivier

Rijcken, T. (2007) Gevangen in de risicospiraal (Trapped in the spiral of risk). Stedenbouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening (S&RO), pp 48-50

Rijcken, T. (2008) The Ultimate Dyke Operator. Volkskrant – Forum, p 12

Rijcken, T., J. Stijnen & N. Slootjes (2012) ‘SimDelta’– Inquiry into an Internet-Based Interactive Model for Water Infrastructure Development in The Netherlands. Water 4 (4), pp 295-320

Rijcken, T. & D. Christopher (2013) ‘SimDelta global’ – towards a standardised interactive model for water infrastructure development. European Journal of Geography 4 (1), p. 6-21

Rooy, P. van & L. Sterrenberg (2000) Het blauwe goud verzilveren; integraal waterbeheer en het belang van omdenken (Cashing the blue gold; integrated water management and the need for rethinking). Den Haag, Rathenau Instituut

Ropeik, D. (2010) How risky is it, really? – Why our fears don’t always match the facts, New York, McGraw-Hill

Saeijs, H. et al. (2004) Changing estuaries, changing views. Rotterdam/Nijmegen/Zeist. Erasmus University/Radboud University/Worldwide Fund for Nature

Schultz, M., J. Hoedeman & R. Meerhof (2013). Interview Melanie Schultz, minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu (Minister for infrastructure and environment). Volkskrant, January 26

Schuppen, S. van (2007) ‘Meebuigen en combineren’ (Bend along and combine), in: Ontwerpen met water (Designing with water). Den Haag, Ministerie van VROM, pp 41-61

Silva, W. & T. van der Linden (2008) Van Lobith en Eijsden naar zee (From Lobith and Eijsden towards the sea). Den Haag, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, DG Water

Smits, A.J.M., P.H. Nienhuis & H.L.F. Saeijs (2006) Changing estuaries, changing views (opinion paper). Hydrobiologia 565 (1), pp 339-355

SNK (2014) Klimaatbuffers 2.0 – Afsluitdijk. Retrieved from: www.klimaatbuffers.nl/afsluitdijk-page [Accessed February 2014]

Swanenvleugel, B. (2007) Freude am Fluss (Joy at the River), Nijmegen/Gouda, Freude Am Fluss/Leven met Water

TAW (1998) Fundamentals on water defences, Den Haag, Ministry of Water Management/Technical Advisory Committee on Water Defences

Taylor, T. (2011) ‘Risk and uncertainty’, in: Unexpected Economics. Chantilly, Teaching Company

Vrijling, J.K. (2008) Verloren in een zee van mooie plannen (Lost at a sea of plans). Trouw 12 September

Vrijling J.K., W. van Hengel & R.J. Houben (1998) Acceptable risk as a basis for design. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 (1), pp 141-150

V&W (1998) Vierde Nota waterhuishouding – Regeringsbeslissing (Government’s decision on the fourth water plan). Den Haag, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat

V&W (2006) Planologische Kernbeslissing Ruimte voor de Rivier deel 4 (Key planning decision Room for the River part 4), Den Haag: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat

Waterforum (2013) Discussieforum dossier meerlaagsveiligheid (Discussion forum multi-layered safety). Dossier Meerlaagsveiligheid. Retrieved from: www.waterforum.net/dossier/meerlaagsveiligheid

Waterman, R.E. (2008) Integrated coastal policy via building with nature (2nd edition), Den Haag, Ronald Waterman/Building With Nature

Wit, S. de, R. Jongejan & H. van der Most (2010) ‘Niet bij preventie alleen – simulatie en analyse van een debat tussen voor- en tegenstanders van meerlaagsveiligheid’ (More than just prevention – simulation and analysis of a debate between supporters and opponents of multi-layered safety, in: Kijk op waterveiligheid. Delft, Eburon, pp 74-96




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/rius.3.842

Copyright (c) 2015 Ties Rijcken

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.